Archived Story
Flooding complaint resurfaces
Published 7:35pm Friday, August 3, 2012Washington’s City Council knows when Iron Creek resident Charles Daniels will show up at a council meeting — after a heavy rain.
For nine years, Daniels and other Iron Creek residents have complained to the council about flooding in their subdivision in the wakes of those heavy rains. Daniels renewed his complaint at the council’s July 23 meeting. And again, city officials said they would try to help him and other Iron Creek residents.
In those nine years, flooding and drainage problems have plagued the Iron Creek community, which is a part of the city. Iron Creek’s flooding and drainage problems have been blamed on ill-designed drainage ditches, beaver dams and the clogged Mitchell Branch on the south side of U.S. Highway 264. City public-works crews have done some work over the years, helping alleviate the problem.
City officials have informed Iron Creek residents some causes of the problem are out of the city’s jurisdiction and purview.
“I’m here to talk about Iron Creek again. It’s getting worse. It’s not getting no better. We need some help, and we’re not getting any help,” Daniels told the council.
The flooding poses safety hazards and damages property, including vehicles, Daniels said.
“If there’s not going to be anything done — we’re at your guys’ mercy,” Daniels said.
“What I would ask the mayor to do is set up a study committee with the homeowners in Iron Creek and the staff and let’s see if we can’t get this resolved,” Councilman Bobby Roberson said. “I agree with you. Nine years is a long time. The problem is not going away. … Whether the city likes this or not, when you accept an innovative stormwater design, and that’s what we’ve got out there, there are no catch basins out there. … I think what we need to do as a City Council is to take a look and resolve this issue at Iron Creek once and for all.”
Councilman Edward Moultrie Jr. said he sees no need for a study committee when Iron Creek residents and the city know what’s causing the problem.
“I think we fix other areas around town. Iron Creek is a part of our city. We ought to be concerned with … their property,” he said. “We ought to come up with some kind of finances, something to see if we can rectify the problem, even if it’s not the city’s problem that’s causing the problem. Because you are a city resident, we ought to be more proactive and come to your rescue.”
Daniels said elderly people living in Iron Creek “are scared slam to death” when it comes to the flooding.
Councilman Richard Brooks said it’s time the city addressed the matter.
“When need to do something about it this year. We need to come together and get it done,” Brooks said.
“I’m glad the council is ready to take this on,” Jennings said.
The mayor said moving forward with the study committee makes sense because the city needs to know what’s in store for it when it comes to resolving the Iron Creek flooding problem.
Rain / 73° F




Nine years this has been going on and nothing has been done. Sorry does not even begin to describe the city of washington (no capitalization intended)for not handling this after the first complaint. While these residents are suffering from flooding, the city is gaining through taxes being paid by these citizens. Can you say WRONG ON THE cities PART? I have always heard that if you can’t dazzle someone with brilliance, baffle them with stupidity. The city of washington has done the latter, FOR NINE YEARS.
(Report comment)
The city did not build those roads or streets. The subdivision was built by Rick Stevens (I may be wrong , can’t remember) and doesn’t that mean the county planner approved the engineering and design of those roads and yet, the CITY taxpayers are supposed to pay for the improvements? People whine and moan and want no more big government, they want lower taxes, and yet, here we go again — when it comes to their own problems — they expect us to all gleefully pay for fixing the problems they purchased of their own free will. Guess what, ya’ll, if you build in a floodzone, you will get wet when you allow private individuals to determine drainage. Imsay, make the builder pay for the roads. Why don’t the owners of these properties file a class action lawsuit against whoever engineered their mess, and whoever approved it?
(Report comment)
And, can’t help but add this — let’s see, number of taxpayers times amount paid does NOT equal cost of street drainage repair, cost of EMS fire dept, police dept service, etc. What you have here are people who expect the city to fix the county’s mess. Or Rick Stevens or whatever builder built that mess!
(Report comment)